the AI Connector is here

Institutional self-storage data everywhere you work

Move faster with real answers, create professional Excel models with verified data, and build polished memos in minutes. 

TractIQ
Claude
Excel
PowerPoint
ChatGPT

The way you work changes forever

Move faster with
real data

The TractIQ AI Connector delivers verified facility data, market comps, rate trends, and supply benchmarks.

Replace assumptions with verified data

Sourced from verified CMBS disclosures and actual facility performance. Not estimates. Not proxies. The real number.

TractIQ — Excel Component
Portfolio_Market_Analysis.xlsx
TRACTIQ AI CONNECTOR
Home
Insert
Formulas
Data
TractIQ ▾
A1 fx
Verified · TractIQ
A
B
C
D
E
F
1
Facility
Sq Ft
Occ %
10×10 Rate
NOI/SF
vs REIT Δ
2
Austin — Burnet Rd
48,200
91%
$134
$18.20
−$3.90
3
Austin — South Lamar
32,800
88%
$141
$19.40
−$2.70
4
Dallas — Uptown
61,500
94%
$128
$21.10
−$1.00
5
Dallas — Deep Ellum
27,100
79%
$156
$15.80
−$6.30
6
Houston — Midtown
39,400
85%
$119
$17.60
−$4.50
7
Houston — Heights
52,200
92%
$143
$20.30
−$1.80
8
San Antonio — Stone Oak
44,800
83%
$112
$16.40
−$5.70
9
Portfolio Avg
=AVG(B2:B8)
87.4%
=AVG(D2:D8)
$18.40
−$3.70
10
REIT Benchmark
91.2%
$162
$22.10
baseline
NOI/SF — Portfolio vs. REIT Benchmark ($22.1/sf avg)
Your Portfolio
REIT Benchmark
Austin
$18.8 vs $22.1 −$3.3
Dallas
$18.5 vs $22.1 −$3.6
Houston
$19.0 vs $22.1 −$3.1
San Antonio
$16.4 vs $22.1 −$5.7
REIT Avg
$22.1 baseline
Portfolio avg NOI/sf $18.40 vs REIT avg −$3.70/sf
Market Analysis
Rate History
Supply Pipeline
+ New
Ready

Replace assumptions with verified data

Sourced from verified CMBS disclosures and actual facility performance. Not estimates. Not proxies. The real number.

Create data-rich decks in minutes

Build polished institutional memos and underwriting models.

TractIQ — PDF Memo Component
TractIQ_Meridian_Capital_Trade_Area_Brief.pdf
TRACTIQ AI CONNECTOR
File
View
Tools
Generating report...
Page 1 of 4
Meridian Capital Group — Portfolio & Trade-Area Brief
Competitive depth across 4 anchor sites: operators, revenue trajectories, pricing trends, and supply pipeline within 5 miles
Prepared forSarah Mitchell, Meridian Capital Group
Methodology windowCMBS financials 2019 through YE 2024; pricing Jan 2023 through Apr 2026
Scope of this memoTrade-area pricing, operator composition, pipeline, and CMBS benchmark data within 5 miles of each anchor site.
This memo is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice. Data is derived from TractIQ's proprietary database, including public CMBS filings, operator website pricing, and municipal permit records, and is provided on an "as-is" basis without warranty as to accuracy or completeness. © 2026 TractIQ, Inc.
Executive Summary
TractIQ analyzed four trade areas for Meridian Capital Group: Austin, TX; Nashville, TN; Phoenix, AZ; and Charlotte, NC. The 5-mile rings around each anchor present four meaningfully different storage markets. Austin is supply-constrained with strong occupancy (avg 91.2%) despite a 14% rate correction from 2022 peaks — the demand fundamentals remain intact. Nashville is the highest-growth market with population up 6.2% since 2020 and zero CMBS-tracked pipeline within 3 miles of the anchor. Phoenix shows the broadest margin compression (avg −6.8pp from 2022 peak) as new supply delivered into a softening demand environment. Charlotte is the most fragmented market, split 52/48 between institutional and independent operators, with the most resilient NOI margins in the set. Across all four, current web rates sit ~18% below street rates — indicating operators are using online concessions to sustain occupancy. Details by section follow.
4
Anchor Markets Analyzed
74
CMBS Facilities Tracked
89.4%
Portfolio Avg Occupancy
1. Anchor Footprint & Demographics
Each figure in this memo is built from the 5-mile trade area surrounding the anchor sites listed below. Demographics are pulled from block-group data intersecting the 5-mile ring, population-weighted for median household income.
AnchorSubmarket5-mi Pop Med HH Inc% RenterPop Growth
AustinSouth Congress318,420$82,14041.2%+5.8%
NashvilleThe Gulch224,860$74,39044.7%+6.2%
PhoenixMidtown412,190$61,82038.9%+4.1%
CharlotteSouth End287,640$79,55035.6%+5.3%
2. Revenue Trajectories — CMBS Competitive Set
Figure 1 plots annual Effective Gross Income from 2019 forward for every CMBS-reporting facility within 5 miles of any anchor. Revenue trajectories follow the now-familiar post-COVID arc: strong ramp from 2020 through mid-2022, followed by a plateau or modest decline. The top performer is StoreSmart Nashville ($3.4M EGI, recently stabilized), while Phoenix comps show the most pronounced correction off 2022 peaks.
Annual EGI by Facility — CMBS Competitors ($M) · 2019–2024
$3.5M $2.5M $1.5M 2019 2021 2022 2023 2024
Nashville
Austin
Phoenix
Charlotte
3. NOI Margin Performance by Market
Margin compression is most severe in Phoenix, where CMBS comps averaged 70.2% peak NOI margin (mostly peaking in 2022) and 63.4% latest — a 6.8pp compression as operating costs outpaced revenue growth. Austin and Nashville show far more resilient margins, down only 1-2pp from peak. Charlotte's independent operators continue to outperform institutional comps on margin, likely reflecting lower management fees.
NOI Margin — Peak vs. Latest by Market
Austin (peak)
76.1%
Austin (latest)
74.2%
Nashville (peak)
78.4%
Nashville (latest)
76.9%
Phoenix (peak)
70.2%
Phoenix (latest)
63.4%
Charlotte (peak)
73.1%
Charlotte (latest)
71.6%
4. Operator Composition & Pipeline
Austin and Nashville are REIT-dominated (78% and 71% respectively), providing pricing discipline but limiting acquisition opportunities. Phoenix has the most diverse operator mix with 18 sophisticated private operators alongside 22 REITs. Charlotte's 52/48 institutional-independent split creates potential off-market deal flow. Pipeline risk is concentrated in Phoenix (4 projects, 318k NRSF under construction) and minimal in Nashville (0 permitted projects within 3 miles).
MarketREITsSoph. Private IndependentPipeline NRSFPipeline Risk
Austin143184,000Moderate
Nashville12410Low
Phoenix22187318,000High
Charlotte92862,000Moderate
Appendix A. CMBS-Reporting Competitors
Every competitor in the anchor trade areas with full CMBS financials, including years reported, latest EGI, EGI/NRSF, multi-year CAGR, and NOI margin change from peak.
FacilityMarketNRSF Latest EGICAGRMarginΔ Peak
StoreSmart NashvilleNashville68,200$3,412,8509.4%76.9%0.0pp
Extra Space — S. CongressAustin94,500$2,847,3207.8%74.2%−1.9pp
CubeSmart — Midtown PHXPhoenix112,400$2,614,1806.2%63.4%−6.8pp
Public Storage — South EndCharlotte76,800$2,391,6408.1%71.6%−1.5pp
Life Storage — NashvilleNashville52,100$1,988,45011.2%77.3%0.0pp
iStorage — Phoenix WPhoenix88,300$1,742,9203.4%58.1%−9.2pp
SecurCare — Charlotte NCCharlotte44,600$1,624,8106.9%69.8%−2.1pp
5. Next Steps
This brief positions Meridian to size four opportunities with distinct risk profiles. Nashville's zero-pipeline environment and strong margin resilience make it the most defensible near-term entry. Austin's supply-constrained fundamentals support a long-term thesis despite current rate correction. Phoenix requires conservative year-one underwriting given pipeline exposure. Charlotte's fragmented operator landscape creates off-market deal flow potential. TractIQ can deliver: (i) parcel-level deep-dive on any anchor, including occupancy seasonality and full P&L lines; (ii) refined competitive analysis filtered to Meridian's target product spec; (iii) updated pricing pulls at any cadence required.

A smarter workflow

Before, your underwriting models ran on assumptions. The TractIQ AI Connector replaces those assumptions with verified data.

before

after

Industry Leaders Who
Trust TractIQ

The data that closes deals. Inside every tool you trust.