Q1 2026 · SELF-STORAGE REIT DATA

The self-storage REIT data behind every confident deal

The market-level rate and occupancy data behind our Q1 2026 Self-Storage REIT Report — realized rent per occupied square foot, year-over-year movement, and physical occupancy, broken out MSA by MSA across the five public storage REITs.

Free Download

Download the Q1 2026 REIT Report Source Data

The national average says flat. Your market says otherwise.

At the national level, Q1 2026 REIT rents moved within about two points of flat — easy to read as a quiet market. Underneath that average, a single operator’s best and worst markets ran 11 to 19 points apart. A national number simply can’t price a deal in a specific trade area.

Flat national averages

Q1 2026 rents moved within ~2 points of flat for every REIT — read that as “quiet” and you'll misprice.

Wide local spreads

Within a single operator’s footprint, the gap between its best and worst market ran 11 to 19 percentage points of rent growth this quarter.

Same metro, different story

Two operators in the same MSA ran 10 points apart — the market average alone can't underwrite a deal.

THE DATA

See the data behind the rates.

National REIT rents looked roughly flat in Q1 2026 — but the source rate data tells a sharper story. Below: REIT street rates against achieved rent (a ~25% spread), and same-store occupancy versus the broader market. The full data set adds rent per occupied square foot, MSA by MSA.

Street rate vs. achieved rent — all REITs

Q1 2026 self-storage REIT street rate vs. achieved rent chart — all REITs, ~25% street-to-achieved spread

TractIQ-tracked REIT street rates vs. non-REIT street rates and weighted-average achieved rent — a ~25% spread. (Q1 2026)

REIT vs. non-REIT occupancy

Q1 2026 self-storage REIT vs. non-REIT same-store occupancy chart

Same-store REIT occupancy holds above the broader non-REIT universe. (Q1 2026)

MSA-level data to inform underwriting assumptions

Realized rent per occupied sq ft by MSA

Market-level rent for the five public storage REITs, broken out metro by metro across roughly 5,800 facilities.

Year-over-year rent & occupancy trends

See how rents and physical occupancy moved this quarter — and which direction each market is heading.

One-click export

Download clean, structured market data from the REITs

Five public REITs, every disclosed market

Public Storage, Extra Space, CubeSmart, NSA, and SmartStop — refreshed every quarter.

HOW IT WORKS

Get the data in three steps.

Request the set

Drop your email in the form — no sales call, no credit card.

We verify & package

Get verified REIT rent, occupancy, and year-over-year movement, compiled MSA by MSA and ready to use.

Download

Export straight to your computer to help inform underwriting assumptions.

FREE DOWNLOAD

Free Q1 2026 REIT data set — rent per sq ft, year-over-year movement, and occupancy, MSA by MSA

TRACTIQ · Q1 2026 REIT DATA
Q1 2026 Self-Storage REIT Data — Rent & Occupancy by MSA

Companion data · Q1 2026

FAQ

Self-storage REIT data, answered

Market-level data behind our Q1 2026 Self-Storage REIT Report: realized rent per occupied square foot, year-over-year rent movement, and physical occupancy, broken out MSA by MSA for the five public storage REITs.
Public Storage, Extra Space, CubeSmart, National Storage Affiliates (NSA), and SmartStop — roughly 5,800 facilities and more than 420 million rentable square feet across their disclosed markets.
At the national level, Q1 2026 rents moved within about two points of flat for every REIT. But inside a single operator’s footprint, the gap between its best and worst market ran 11 to 19 points — so a national average can be dangerously misleading for a specific asset.
Strength clustered in the Midwest and Northeast/Mid-Atlantic — St. Louis, Richmond, Minneapolis, Boston, Washington D.C., and Chicago. Weakness was a Sun Belt story led by Texas (San Antonio, Austin, Dallas–Fort Worth) and cooling Florida occupancy.
Underwrite locally. Benchmark a subject property against REIT-reported rent and occupancy in its own MSA and submarket — even two operators in the same metro can be 10 points apart, so the market average alone isn’t enough.
Yes. Complete the form on this page for instant access to the Q1 2026 market-level data set. No credit card required, and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Industry Leaders Who
Trust TractIQ

Inside TractIQ’s Q1 2026 self-storage REIT data

This quarter we’re opening up the market-level rate and occupancy data behind our Q1 2026 Self-Storage REIT Report, pulled across the five publicly traded operators: Public Storage, Extra Space, CubeSmart, National Storage Affiliates (NSA), and SmartStop. Together the data set spans roughly 5,800 facilities and more than 420 million rentable square feet, broken out MSA by MSA with realized rent per occupied square foot, year-over-year rent movement, and physical occupancy trends.

At the national level, achieved rent per occupied square foot moved within about two percentage points of flat for every REIT in the group, from roughly -2.1% at Public Storage to +1.3% at SmartStop, and portfolio-wide occupancy shifted by less than a point in either direction for all five. If you stopped there, you’d conclude the storage market simply isn’t doing much. That conclusion would be wrong almost everywhere.

The dispersion the average hides

Underneath those flat national numbers sits enormous local variation. Within a single operator’s footprint, the gap between its best and worst market ran 11 to 19 percentage points of rent growth this quarter.

REITNational rent/occ sq ft YoYStrongest marketWeakest marketSpread
Public Storage-2.1%Minneapolis +4.8%Austin -6.2%11 pp
Extra Space+0.9%Richmond +8.2%San Antonio -11.1%19 pp
CubeSmart-0.4%Hartford +5.1%Dallas–Ft. Worth -10.5%16 pp
NSA+1.1%San Juan, PR +4.3%San Antonio -7.3%12 pp
SmartStop+1.3%Chicago +6.2%Port St. Lucie -4.3%11 pp

Across all disclosed markets, the split was nearly even: about 53% posted rising rents and 47% posted falling rents. Realized rents ranged from under $11 per square foot in tertiary markets like Oklahoma City, Shreveport, and Amarillo to nearly $56 per square foot in Honolulu, a five-fold spread that makes any single national average rent effectively meaningless for an underwriting model.

Want this broken out for the markets you underwrite?
Get the free Q1 2026 data

Where it’s working, and where it isn’t

The strength clustered in the Midwest and the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic, older, supply-constrained, slower-growth metros. St. Louis (+7.6%), Richmond (+8.2%), Indianapolis (+4.2%), Minneapolis (+4.8%), Boston (+4.3%), Washington, D.C. (+3% to +4.5%), and Chicago (+3% to +6.2% across all four operators present there) led the pack.

The weakness was just as concentrated, and it was overwhelmingly a Sun Belt story. Texas was the epicenter: San Antonio fell 5.8% to 11.1% depending on the operator, Austin slid as much as 7.3%, and Dallas–Fort Worth ranged from roughly flat to down 10.5%. Florida cooled on the occupancy side, with Tampa losing 2 to 4 points of occupancy across every REIT and coastal markets like Cape Coral–Fort Myers and Port St. Lucie giving back both rent and occupancy. These are precisely the markets that absorbed the heaviest new development in 2021–2023, and the oversupply hangover is now showing up in the rate data.

Same market, different outcomes: the underwriting takeaway

The most important point for anyone underwriting an acquisition is that even the MSA average can mislead. In Dallas–Fort Worth this quarter, Extra Space was essentially flat at -0.3% while CubeSmart was down 10.5%, a ten-point gap inside the same metro, driven by submarket mix, asset vintage, lease-up exposure, and revenue-management strategy. In Phoenix, physical occupancy ranged from 78.9% at one operator to 95.1% at another. And rent and occupancy frequently moved in opposite directions: several operators pushed rate while shedding occupancy, and others traded rate to defend occupancy, different bets on the same fundamentals.

The lesson is the one we keep coming back to: storage is a local business, and it underwrites locally. A pro forma built on “national rents were roughly flat” would have been dangerously optimistic in parts of Texas and far too conservative in the Midwest. National REIT averages are useful for observing general trends, but they are the wrong instrument for valuing a specific asset in a specific trade area. The data that matters lives at the market and submarket level, exactly what our self-storage market data, occupancy data, and underwriting guide are built to surface. When you’re ready to pressure-test a specific deal, you can book a demo or compare pricing.

Data source: TractIQ Q1 2026 Self-Storage REIT Report. Figures reflect operator-disclosed MSA-level rent per occupied square foot and physical occupancy.

Access real facility-level performance alongside rates, supply, demand, and ownership

Free REIT Source Data set
Street & web rates + occupancy for 40+ MSAs
Get the free data